So after the big clusterf*** with easyDNS being falsely blamed for taking down wikileaks, somebody posts the inevitable question "Would easyDNS take wikileaks DNS"? and from there makes what I think is a dubious extension: by NOT taking them we're doing the same thing as "taking them down".
What I find dubious about all this is it seems that we are being taken to task for this and held under a more rigorous scrutiny around this incident, than the company that actually did take them down.
Having said that, earlier today when after seeing YET ANOTHER BAD TWEET that wikileaks had setup wikileaks.ch on easyDNS, I called my systems group and told them I wanted the following conditions in place, so consider this:
An Open Letter to Wikileaks Regarding DNS Hosting
If they were to put their DNS here, then this is what we'd want to have in place:
- An open channel of communication where we could communicate with their IT people 24/7, especially going into a weekend.
- We'd prefer to be the domain registrar for the domain so we could have control over the nameserver delegations and would be able to move them around on-on-the-fly, as per the tactics I outlined in my previous posts about DOS attacks and DNS. Keeping in mind we are a non-US based registrar, we would adhere to Canadian law with respect to takedown requests, not DMCA or other US laws.
- We'd want the domain to be one within a TLD that supports realtime updates, for the same reason.
- We would want to initially limit their delegation to our nameservers deployed out on Prolexic, which is basically the most DOS-resistant stuff we have, possibly complimented with some ad-hoc standalone nodes.
That's basically how we would want to play it. Again, this is all hypothetical.
[ Note to Wikileaks: if you're reading this and want to add a domain after hours this weekend, email me direct markjr [at] you know what (and it's not everydns.net ]